Talk:Tutorial Walkthrough - Revision history

Loremipsum at 13:15, 28 September 2013

2013-09-28T13:15:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:15, 28 September 2013
Line 22:		Line 22:
	::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance. This would probably matter most when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)		::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance. This would probably matter most when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)
	:::I have nothing to oppose this arguments :-) Though I personally don't see a reason for avoiding meta templates, if they are documented and categorized well enough. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 07:44, 8 January 2008 (EST)		:::I have nothing to oppose this arguments :-) Though I personally don't see a reason for avoiding meta templates, if they are documented and categorized well enough. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 07:44, 8 January 2008 (EST)

			== New Tutorial Walkthrough ==

			Jawir: could I suggest to move characters' pictures to the right so they don't break the text indentation/formatting?

Loremipsum: moved Talk:Tutorial Walk Through to Talk:Tutorial Walkthrough: correcting title

2013-09-18T07:43:19Z

moved Talk:Tutorial Walk Through to Talk:Tutorial Walkthrough: correcting title

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:43, 18 September 2013
(No difference)

Daevaorn: /* Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css */

2008-01-08T12:44:53Z

Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 8 January 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)		:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)
	::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance. This would probably matter most when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)		::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance. This would probably matter most when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)
			:::I have nothing to oppose this arguments :-) Though I personally don't see a reason for avoiding meta templates, if they are documented and categorized well enough. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 07:44, 8 January 2008 (EST)

Tuxide: /* Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css */ wordage

2008-01-07T20:23:24Z

Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css: wordage

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 7 January 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)		[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)
	:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)		:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)
	::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance.~~..which becomes irrelevant~~ when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)		::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance. This would probably matter most when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)

Tuxide: /* Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css */ comment about DOM structure

2008-01-07T20:07:46Z

Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css: comment about DOM structure

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 7 January 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)		[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)
	:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)		:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)
			::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance...which becomes irrelevant when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)

Daevaorn: /* Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css */

2008-01-07T10:50:08Z

Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 7 January 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* [[:Template:TutSectionStop]]		* [[:Template:TutSectionStop]]
	[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)		[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)
			:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)

Tuxide: Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css

2008-01-07T03:11:30Z

Edits to MediaWiki:Monobook.css

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:11, 7 January 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	For a long time the elves skin has been default, do you think we should upload the icons for that skin and use them in this tutorial? Not many i know of use the default skin and using those buttons here could confuse new people that have not played the game before. --[[User:Caarrie\|Caarrie]] 15:46, 6 January 2008 (EST)		For a long time the elves skin has been default, do you think we should upload the icons for that skin and use them in this tutorial? Not many i know of use the default skin and using those buttons here could confuse new people that have not played the game before. --[[User:Caarrie\|Caarrie]] 15:46, 6 January 2008 (EST)
	:I concur that elves skin should be used (unless Talad has it changed back). [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 21:51, 6 January 2008 (EST)		:I concur that elves skin should be used (unless Talad has it changed back). [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 21:51, 6 January 2008 (EST)

			== Edits to [[MediaWiki:Monobook.css]] ==

			After some recent rounds of edits made to this page, perhaps some edits should be made to [[MediaWiki:Monobook.css]] so that the styles on this page can be used elsewhere on the website. For example, the CSS in [[:Template:TutEmote]] should be defined in, say, an npc-emote CSS class. The templates used on this page are included below, and can only be used as a part of a table in MediaWiki markup.
			* [[:Template:TutAddress]]
			* [[:Template:TutEmote]]
			* [[:Template:TutNote]]
			* [[:Template:TutNoteNB]]
			* [[:Template:TutSay]]
			* [[:Template:TutSectionStart]]
			* [[:Template:TutSectionStop]]
			[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Tuxide: /* Icons */ concur

2008-01-07T02:51:15Z

Icons: concur

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 7 January 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	For a long time the elves skin has been default, do you think we should upload the icons for that skin and use them in this tutorial? Not many i know of use the default skin and using those buttons here could confuse new people that have not played the game before. --[[User:Caarrie\|Caarrie]] 15:46, 6 January 2008 (EST)		For a long time the elves skin has been default, do you think we should upload the icons for that skin and use them in this tutorial? Not many i know of use the default skin and using those buttons here could confuse new people that have not played the game before. --[[User:Caarrie\|Caarrie]] 15:46, 6 January 2008 (EST)
			:I concur that elves skin should be used (unless Talad has it changed back). [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 21:51, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Caarrie: Icons

2008-01-06T20:46:55Z

Icons

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 6 January 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[Image:Tutorial_Overview.jpg\|thumb\|center]]		[[Image:Tutorial_Overview.jpg\|thumb\|center]]
	--[[User:Caarrie\|Caarrie]] 12:13, 6 January 2008 (EST)		--[[User:Caarrie\|Caarrie]] 12:13, 6 January 2008 (EST)

			== Icons ==

			For a long time the elves skin has been default, do you think we should upload the icons for that skin and use them in this tutorial? Not many i know of use the default skin and using those buttons here could confuse new people that have not played the game before. --[[User:Caarrie\|Caarrie]] 15:46, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Caarrie at 17:13, 6 January 2008

2008-01-06T17:13:04Z

New page

here is a pic of the tutorial you can edit as you want
[[Image:Tutorial_Overview.jpg|thumb|center]]
--[[User:Caarrie|Caarrie]] 12:13, 6 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 8 January 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)		:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)
	::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance. This would probably matter most when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)		::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance. This would probably matter most when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)
			:::I have nothing to oppose this arguments :-) Though I personally don't see a reason for avoiding meta templates, if they are documented and categorized well enough. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 07:44, 8 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 7 January 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)		[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)
	:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)		:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)
	::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance.~~..which becomes irrelevant~~ when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)		::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance. This would probably matter most when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 7 January 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)		[[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 22:11, 6 January 2008 (EST)
	:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)		:If we want to keep that editable by the public (read: me ;-) ) I would consider using templates to make the style definitions reusable. --[[User:Daevaorn\|Daevaorn]] 05:50, 7 January 2008 (EST)
			::I also thought about that, but decided against it because I always thought meta-templates were discouraged on MediaWiki (for really large sites like Wikipedia). Mostly, however, I can personally benefit by the use of CSS class names: The resulting DOM tree becomes smaller since the style isn't repeated all the time, and the class names add structure to the document since the XHTML is otherwise an unstructured format that only cares about visual appearance...which becomes irrelevant when we want to output this in other formats. [[User:Tuxide\|Tuxide]] 15:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)