Talk:Klyros Language/Vocabulary - Revision history

Grigori: Replaced content with 'I moved all content of this page to discussion of Klyros language.--~~~~'

2009-11-12T17:04:55Z

Replaced content with 'I moved all content of this page to discussion of Klyros language.--~~~~'

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 12 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I ~~thought I would open~~ this ~~discussion to allow communication like on the other Klyran~~ page.		I moved all content of this page to discussion of Klyros language.--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
	~~-bguy~~

	~~==Words==~~
	I'm thinking most single-ideographic words should be one syllable long, two max. I also think there should be a big diversity among the words so they take advantage of all the letters and all 11 vowels (a, e, i, o, u, aa, ee, ii, oo, uu, and '). Should there be other guide lines and are these good enough to ~~declare guidelines?~~
	~~-bguy~~


	I also agree on one syllable MUST be prefered. Otherwise we are to have transliterations that can be interpreted too many ways with too many senses. As for diversity you will soon find that as you add more and more ideograms, pronouncing diversity will vanish anyway so there is not much sense in trying to increase diversity now.
	~~--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)~~


	~~==Konos formation==~~
	~~For every language many words, particularly nouns share the same root. For example "brother" and "brotherhood", "payer", "payee" and "payment". There must be distinguishing between them inside class~~ of konos. The only way I see to do it is to develop further suffixes. For now it is "sin" (-er) and "san" (ee) only. I think we should add more for naming nouns that somehow relate to the ksin that is the root. For example, a tool that was used for doing the action, a one who assisted the action, for one who opposed the action and so on.
	~~--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)~~


	~~Sounds reasonable, but the~~ Klyros Language is also an adaptive and flexible one, so too many additions like this might might it to inflexible. Also, I don't think it should be a carbon copy of Common, so that it has its own uniqueness in most sections. Personally I thought that '''sin''', '''san''', and the lack of them would be enough for the most part, but if you can think of one or two more very useful ones, I wouldn't disagree.
	~~-bguy~~

	~~==Vocabulary itself==~~
	I think after describing ideograms we shall at last have transliteration vocabulary at the end of the page. But it is much of work that should be done while no change of ideograms (except draws). So we must all agree on that stage of work to start.
	--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, ~~20 May~~ 2009 (~~PDT~~)

	If you could set up an extra column I'd be able to start that a bit, and transliteration isn't too much work. If we decided to change the word, the transliteration could easily be change along with it.
	~~-bguy~~

Bguy: /* Vocabulary itself */

2009-05-21T11:12:16Z

Vocabulary itself

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 21 May 2009
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I think after describing ideograms we shall at last have transliteration vocabulary at the end of the page. But it is much of work that should be done while no change of ideograms (except draws). So we must all agree on that stage of work to start.		I think after describing ideograms we shall at last have transliteration vocabulary at the end of the page. But it is much of work that should be done while no change of ideograms (except draws). So we must all agree on that stage of work to start.
	--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)		--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)

			If you could set up an extra column I'd be able to start that a bit, and transliteration isn't too much work. If we decided to change the word, the transliteration could easily be change along with it.
			-bguy

Bguy: /* Konos formation */

2009-05-21T11:09:49Z

Konos formation

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 21 May 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)		--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)


			Sounds reasonable, but the Klyros Language is also an adaptive and flexible one, so too many additions like this might might it to inflexible. Also, I don't think it should be a carbon copy of Common, so that it has its own uniqueness in most sections. Personally I thought that '''sin''', '''san''', and the lack of them would be enough for the most part, but if you can think of one or two more very useful ones, I wouldn't disagree.
			-bguy

	==Vocabulary itself==		==Vocabulary itself==
	I think after describing ideograms we shall at last have transliteration vocabulary at the end of the page. But it is much of work that should be done while no change of ideograms (except draws). So we must all agree on that stage of work to start.		I think after describing ideograms we shall at last have transliteration vocabulary at the end of the page. But it is much of work that should be done while no change of ideograms (except draws). So we must all agree on that stage of work to start.
	--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)		--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)

Grigori: /* Words */

2009-05-21T00:56:32Z

Words

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 21 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I'm thinking most single-ideographic words should be one syllable long, two max. I also think there should be a big diversity among the words so they take advantage of all the letters and all 11 vowels (a, e, i, o, u, aa, ee, ii, oo, uu, and '). Should there be other guide lines and are these good enough to declare guidelines?		I'm thinking most single-ideographic words should be one syllable long, two max. I also think there should be a big diversity among the words so they take advantage of all the letters and all 11 vowels (a, e, i, o, u, aa, ee, ii, oo, uu, and '). Should there be other guide lines and are these good enough to declare guidelines?
	-bguy		-bguy


			I also agree on one syllable MUST be prefered. Otherwise we are to have transliterations that can be interpreted too many ways with too many senses. As for diversity you will soon find that as you add more and more ideograms, pronouncing diversity will vanish anyway so there is not much sense in trying to increase diversity now.
			--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)


			==Konos formation==
			For every language many words, particularly nouns share the same root. For example "brother" and "brotherhood", "payer", "payee" and "payment". There must be distinguishing between them inside class of konos. The only way I see to do it is to develop further suffixes. For now it is "sin" (-er) and "san" (ee) only. I think we should add more for naming nouns that somehow relate to the ksin that is the root. For example, a tool that was used for doing the action, a one who assisted the action, for one who opposed the action and so on.
			--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)


			==Vocabulary itself==
			I think after describing ideograms we shall at last have transliteration vocabulary at the end of the page. But it is much of work that should be done while no change of ideograms (except draws). So we must all agree on that stage of work to start.
			--[[User:Grigori\|Grigori]] 17:56, 20 May 2009 (PDT)

Bguy at 21:44, 17 May 2009

2009-05-17T21:44:32Z

New page

I thought I would open this discussion to allow communication like on the other Klyran page.
-bguy

==Words==
I'm thinking most single-ideographic words should be one syllable long, two max. I also think there should be a big diversity among the words so they take advantage of all the letters and all 11 vowels (a, e, i, o, u, aa, ee, ii, oo, uu, and '). Should there be other guide lines and are these good enough to declare guidelines?
-bguy