Talk:Enkidukai Language/Vocab Table Reverse - Revision history

Hokinon at 07:04, 20 July 2007

2007-07-20T07:04:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 20 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:

	peer review, from you and whoever :)		peer review, from you and whoever :)

Line 10:		Line 9:
	Tables up to date as of now I'll try a bit harder to keep up		Tables up to date as of now I'll try a bit harder to keep up
	[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 11:07, 18 July 2007 (EDT)		[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 11:07, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

			removed table adding words too fast for me to keep up [[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 03:04, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

Hokinon at 15:07, 18 July 2007

2007-07-18T15:07:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 18 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:


	peer review, from you and whoever :)		peer review, from you and whoever :)
Line 8:		Line 7:

	-Irri again		-Irri again

			Tables up to date as of now I'll try a bit harder to keep up
			[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 11:07, 18 July 2007 (EDT)

Irri at 02:50, 6 June 2007

2007-06-06T02:50:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 6 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Irri,~~

	~~Sure I don't mind maintaining, and I'll look at the tables, it was just a quick and dirty way of getting content up for review~~

	~~--[[User~~:~~Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 13:23, 4 June 2007 (EDT~~)		peer review, from you and whoever :)

	~~altered the table to wiki markup instead of html do you want cell borders?~~		--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 17:12, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

	--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 14:36, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

	I ~~don't have a preference either way, I am accustomed to using~~ the ~~vocabulary page~~ the ~~way it has been~~. ~~Which review is this?~~		I see :) Could do do the markup on your other new table as well? Then the links at the bottom seem to work properly.

	-Irri		-Irri again

	~~peer review, from you and whoever :)~~

	~~--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 17:12, 5 June 2007 (EDT)~~

Hokinon at 21:12, 5 June 2007

2007-06-05T21:12:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 5 June 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	-Irri		-Irri

			peer review, from you and whoever :)

			--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 17:12, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

Irri at 23:43, 4 June 2007

2007-06-04T23:43:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 4 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Hokinon, the trick will be to keep these tables updated as new content goes up :) Are you willing to do it? Otherwise, we can try and ask posters to add each new word to the three pages.~~

	~~Also, there is a warning about the pages being too long (47kb) which may cause some editing errors. If we reformat them with less coding that will make a page with more content more feasible. -Irri~~

	Irri,		Irri,

Line 12:		Line 8:

	--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 14:36, 4 June 2007 (EDT)		--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 14:36, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

			I don't have a preference either way, I am accustomed to using the vocabulary page the way it has been. Which review is this?

			-Irri

Hokinon at 18:36, 4 June 2007

2007-06-04T18:36:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 4 June 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 13:23, 4 June 2007 (EDT)		--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 13:23, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

			altered the table to wiki markup instead of html do you want cell borders?

			--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 14:36, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

Hokinon at 17:23, 4 June 2007

2007-06-04T17:23:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 4 June 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Also, there is a warning about the pages being too long (47kb) which may cause some editing errors. If we reformat them with less coding that will make a page with more content more feasible. -Irri		Also, there is a warning about the pages being too long (47kb) which may cause some editing errors. If we reformat them with less coding that will make a page with more content more feasible. -Irri

	Irri:		Irri,

	Sure I don't mind maintaining, and I'll look at the tables, it was just a quick and dirty way of getting content up for review		Sure I don't mind maintaining, and I'll look at the tables, it was just a quick and dirty way of getting content up for review

	~~Hoki~~		--[[User:Hokinon\|Hokinon]] 13:23, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

Hokinon at 17:22, 4 June 2007

2007-06-04T17:22:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 4 June 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Also, there is a warning about the pages being too long (47kb) which may cause some editing errors. If we reformat them with less coding that will make a page with more content more feasible. -Irri		Also, there is a warning about the pages being too long (47kb) which may cause some editing errors. If we reformat them with less coding that will make a page with more content more feasible. -Irri

			Irri:

			Sure I don't mind maintaining, and I'll look at the tables, it was just a quick and dirty way of getting content up for review

			Hoki

Irri at 23:39, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T23:39:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 3 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hokinon, the trick will be to keep these tables updated as new content goes up :) Are you willing to do it? Otherwise, we can try and ask posters to add each new word to the three pages. -Irri		Hokinon, the trick will be to keep these tables updated as new content goes up :) Are you willing to do it? Otherwise, we can try and ask posters to add each new word to the three pages.

			Also, there is a warning about the pages being too long (47kb) which may cause some editing errors. If we reformat them with less coding that will make a page with more content more feasible. -Irri

Irri at 23:31, 3 June 2007

2007-06-03T23:31:15Z

New page

Hokinon, the trick will be to keep these tables updated as new content goes up :) Are you willing to do it? Otherwise, we can try and ask posters to add each new word to the three pages. -Irri